![]() The G-Shock GW-9400 Rangeman is the cheapest G-Shock that comes with the triple sensor, and it's considerably more expensive. If you want an affordable triple sensor, Pro Trek is your best choice. ![]() More specifically, Pro Treks are known for their Triple Sensor that includes: But at any price point below that, Pro Treks blow G-Shocks out of the water when it comes to features. The two brands are roughly equal when you get to the advanced models in the $200 price range. Pro Treks generally have more features than G-Shocks. While not a deal-breaker, the ease of scratching is something you should be aware of before buying Pro Treks (especially the titanium models). In other words, Pro Treks get old faster than G-Shocks. Pro Trek external parts are also not as easy to replace as on G-Shocks, which means that once you scratch it the damage is pretty much permanent. Last but not least - Pro Trek watch bezels are notoriously easy to scratch, much more so than G-Shocks. ![]() I even wrote 8,000 words and reviewed 28 models to find the best G-Shock watch for sale today.īut if you just want a rugged watch with advanced features, Pro Trek will get the job done just as well. Is Pro Trek rugged enough for mostly anything? Yes.ĭon't get me wrong, I love G-Shocks.Will a Pro Trek survive a truck driving over it? Probably not.Will a Pro Trek survive getting thrown off a cliff? Probably not. ![]() But it also won't break easily even if you're rough with it. Sure, it's not as tough as a G-Shock and won't withstand extreme abuse. This is not a big deal, because even if you are a recreational diver, you won't be going deeper than 70m… ever.Īs for ruggedness, remember that Pro Trek is a rugged outdoors watch. Pro Treks have less water resistance, only 100m compared to G-shock's 200m. Not bad for a watch that costs less than $50. The test was simple - they drove a truck over it and it survived. In fact, the cheapo G-Shock DW-5600 holds the Guinness World Record "toughest watch in the world" title. This means that you can drop even the cheapest <$50 model off a cliff and nothing will happen to it. All G-Shock models are Shock-Proof and 200m Waterproof. G-Shock is built like a tank and is tougher than any Pro Trek watch out there. Which one's better? Matter of preference. Overall, Pro Trek looks like a high-tech hiking watch, while G-Shock looks like something that you would wear in the military. And while G-Shocks have that geeky feel about them, the Pro Treks are even geekier. I prefer G-Shock's tactical appearance and a more "vintage" military-style. Otherwise, it's really down to personal preference. If you have bad eyesight or just want maximum readability, Pro Trek is the way to go. G-Shock also comes in different shapes and sizes, including the classic square models. Unlike Pro Trek, G-Shock has multiple analog-digital models that are more readable than the full-digital screens. Its smaller screens give G-Shock a rugged, tactical appearance, and are also less likely to break. G-Shock usually has multiple smaller screens and smaller digits than most Pro Trek models, with G-Shock GPR-B1000-1JR Solar-Powered GPS being the only exception. Pro Treks are mostly known for their digital screens, although analog models are getting popular as well (most notably the PRG-600, PRG-650, and PRW-6000 series. Likewise, all other features including the compass are more visible than on a G-Shock, which makes Pro Treks easier to operate. Pro Trek's display is big, round, and the numbers are clearly visible in the center of the screen. The size and design of the display is by far the biggest visual difference between the Pro Trek and a G-Shock watches. Go with Pro Trek if you like having dedicated buttons for your features, and go with G-Shock if you like simplicity and minimalism. G-Shock, on the other hand, is more about maximum toughness and simplicity, and usually has a single button to cycle through different modes. That's because Pro Treks usually have dedicated direct-access buttons for altimeter, compass, and barometer functions. Pro Trek functions are more accessible than G-Shock's. I wouldn't call Pro Treks small either, but they tend to be flatter and lighter than G-Shocks.īecause of that, Pro Trek is generally a better choice if you want a versatile watch that you can also wear in an office environment. G-Shocks are generally bigger than Pro Treks, except for the budget models. Pro Trek: Construction & Design Watch On The Picture: G-Shock GG-1000 Mudmaster Size
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |